Frontend & Experience
What do users see when things go right, and when they break?
WHAT IT CATCHES
- -White screens on error
- -Missing loading & empty states
- -Broken responsive layouts
- -Accessibility gaps
▸ CLAUDE CODE SKILL · MIT · STACK-AGNOSTIC
You shipped an app with Lovable, Bolt, v0, or Claude Code. It works on your screen.launchworthy audits the five domains between "works for me" and"real users are paying and nothing is on fire" — then hands you a scored punch list to get in.
01 · THE GAP
It works on your screen. That is the most expensive sentence in software — because "works for me" and"real users are paying for this and nothing is on fire"are two completely different apps, and the distance between them is where you get breached.
You will not find these. A stranger will. launchworthy finds them first.
02 · THE SCORECARD
03 · THE FIVE DOMAINS
Each one is a question the audit answers against your actual code — worst-first, with exact file paths.
DRAG / SCROLL →What do users see when things go right, and when they break?
WHAT IT CATCHES
Does the engine hold up: APIs, database, jobs, and data flow?
WHAT IT CATCHES
Are the wrong people kept out, and are the bills safe from abuse?
WHAT IT CATCHES
Can you ship, roll back, and serve it fast and safely?
WHAT IT CATCHES
Will you know when it breaks, and can you survive it?
WHAT IT CATCHES
04 · HOW IT WORKS
A one-time setup inside Claude Code. The plugin is then available in every project you ever open.
No flags to memorize. Just say what you want. launchworthy detects your framework and backend and adapts every check to your stack.
You get a scored report in tmp/. It offers to apply the safe fixes — only with your confirmation, only on a clean git state. Fix the blockers, ask again, watch the score go 0/5 → 5/5.
05 · WHY IT'S CREDIBLE
A generic checklist screams about every key in your bundle. Half the time it's wrong. The anon key in your Supabase frontend is supposed to be there. Theservice_role key next to it is a full-database master key that bypasses every rule you wrote. launchworthy knows the difference — because flagging the anon key is how a security report tells you it's amateur.
anon key in the client bundle— public by design; RLS is the real gateservice_role key in the client bundle— bypasses RLS entirely · rotate it nowtasks, profiles— anyone with the anon key reads every rowGetting this pair right is the whole game.
06 · IT ARGUES BACK
Every objection has a counter loaded. It tells you the truth about the risk — then lets you decide.
YOU: "It’s just an MVP."
launchworthy: An MVP with real signups is a real product to the person whose data is in it. The RLS-off table does not know it is an MVP. Attackers scan for it the same day you deploy.
YOU: "I’ll add auth later."
launchworthy: "Later" means after the first user, or the first breach. Turning on RLS after you have live data is harder, not easier. The cheapest time is now, before there is data to leak.
YOU: "No one will find it."
launchworthy: Bots find it. Exposed Supabase projects and open Firebase databases are indexed and scanned continuously. "Nobody knows my URL" is not a security control.
YOU: "The AI tool wouldn’t ship it insecure."
launchworthy: AI coding tools optimize for a working demo, not a hardened deploy. They leave RLS off, secrets in the client, and no rate limits by default. That gap is the entire reason this exists.
domains audited
frontend → ops
copy-paste fix playbooks
RLS, rate-limits, headers…
to install, once
then every project
MIT-licensed, forever
fork it, ship it
▸ THE BOUNCER IS FREE. THE BREACH IS NOT.
Then just ask Claude: "Is this app production ready? Harden it."